taken from my Forum: www.vivicentro.org
on this there will, from now, will continue updating and adding documents. Whoever is interested can
always use the same link as it is there that will update everything.
Thank you all for any attention, interest and maybe some of your opinion here or on the forum.
Dear,
here I am with what was promised to you in another area (no one forgets Abel Section: PATROL: how to know, how to avoid them, how to fight).
From today I will begin to include here all actions relating to:
Judgement of First Instance
for the job following accusations of pedophilia against kindergarten teacher Sisters of Brescia, as well as: auxiliary (e), janitor, priests of the church next ........ number of undetected
___________________________________________________________________
Judgement No. 1333 of 06.04.2007
Filed 05/07/2007
ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE
PROFESSOR OF THE COURT BRESCIA
Second Criminal Chamber
Meeting in closed session and composed of: Dr. Francesco
Maddalo - President Dr. Antonio Minervini
- Judge
Dr. Luca Tringali - Judge- East
NOTE: This post will be continuously increased with the addition of attachments, as they put together a fair and part ... logic to insert.
If you are interested, therefore please always check quast'area / or post, however, have a look in the Home Page, where, from time to time I shall indicate new entries.
In thanking everyone, I continue with my introductory post. __________________________________________________________________
As was stated I chose to put it all here because:
- NOT really a technician who can do that by example, law and school will, however, worthy of the honor to represent "technical" authority in an appropriate forum.
would have been good in Videoentertainement but .... is not even a video which is a shame because it excels as text Zelig;
- In the "technical" NOT could possibly discuss it and, moreover, not with the freedom of thought and expression that here you can have.
better here then.
area where this is serious stuff but have implications, origins, connotations and tragic at the same time comical.
The classic things, in short, of which one could say
If there was not crying, it would be funny!
and then in discussing it, referring instead to open their minds and hearts to wisdom and to use more than you think and you expect.
in this area so there is a suitable accommodation and the right spirit for, by chance, and discuss how to discern perhaps deserves.
That said, allow me a few notes:
a) to insert all "symptoms" is to divide a collection of 544 pages hard to "manage", which to begin immediately (once and decisomi rassegnatomi working copy) to give you something you can begin to see and, above all, "assimilate" with due calmness and attention;
b) This first part gives an account
- stakeholders,
- descizione summary of the abuses suffered by children,
- the counts of defendants
(about it, and since yesterday, I proceeded to enter, in the technical area of \u200b\u200bour lawyers, the full text of the Criminal Code again broken down into "volumes" in order to so you can quickly reach a certain item is called the allegations that the ruling)
The lists will notice that missing guidance on some of the children (then called up instead in the charges) since this is for children whose parents were unable and / or unwilling to rely on justice. Why not accustomed to foreigners and our alleged laws? For absolute confidence in giutizia?, Total annihilation?, Other? ........ is neither necessary nor useful to know and he does not speak except to indicate precisely that the list of children of the account 19 children but that the abused and interrogated, in fact, are 25 (at least to separate those who have had the audacity to "resent" obrobriose for such "attention")
also lacks an indication of a defendant who acts but is richamata and that I was identified with an (I).
REFERENCES children then you will find them as a number (1 to 25) each identifying a different child.
REFERENCES defendants instead, you will find them in the form of a letter (A to I), each identifying a different accused.
THE FIRST PART , therefore, I have identified as: Parties concerned
then followed as several other parties.
The next will be: CONCLUSIONS The prosecutor asked: ..........
and so on (at the end of each group included will indicate the title of the next)
Breaking things that I would like to draw your attention:
- Assimilate good reasons inherent in the "allegations" and, above all, the various facets of psychological as, the defendants have "taken on" the rock of silence the child according to the "type" of child with whom they had to do;
- Transpose various and different abuses perpetrated on various children, in groups , and according to well-considered assessments of the child itself and / or at least the group in which it was inserted, and then also the "abusers"
- KEEP into account that these are on children 4 years of age .
The judge, perhaps out of shame - most probably because of habit and legal terminology - continues to reiterate:
Lower 10 years .... or .... less than 14 years!
but True ........ In effect the question almost babies, all Fanciullini (s) on 4 years and it is NOT trivial and for which he has done for how to express themselves, how they are exposed to things etc etc as above that defense lawyers claim instead that they were all legulei (their children or grandchildren perhaps will and even then, the case will lay well ........ at least we hope .... to be able to get justice!).
- Macerata well together until the next entry and then tell me, students and parents, are not deserving of the Oscar-winning screenplay for the script and having heard (as defense) as well "outline" and divide different "strands" of abuse by identifying with great skill and also the "actors" first, for each group, altogether.
then the recitation of the boys ...... not even talk about it ......... Oscarissimi! not be discussed.
Alternative: Zelig Prize to all the other "performers" for having so well been able to bring a tragedy into farce. From lawyers to judges.
Defendants? ........ well, nothing for them. Again only did their dirty interests. Let's say you were the subjects for the "farce". That's it.
It starts then.
0 comments:
Post a Comment